photoblogography - Just some stuff about photography

Hotspot

frying tonight

in Product reviews , Wednesday, July 22, 2015

It’s pretty damned hot down here in Canton Ticino. For at least two weeks, afternoon temperatures have been well above 35C, and there hasn’t been a whisper of rain. People are getting tired and irritable - other people, that is, I’m always like that anyway. It’s hardly conducive to being out and about with a camera, but anyway, something prompted me to dig out my Sigma DP2 Merrill, and fortune favoured me with this grab shot.

dp2m_20150720_0012b

This leads me on to a further note on Mylio. I’ve now decided to become a paying customer, and to try to make Mylio work for me. It isn’t perfectly suited to my needs, but it’s closer than pretty much anything else out there.

Mylio, unsurprisingly, does not support Sigma RAW files. It would be totally unreasonable to expect otherwise.  But there is a workaround to this, if you happen to use Iridient Developer as your favoured processor for Sigma X3F files, as I do. Iridient has a neat feature which, when you send it a JPG or a TIFF, allows you to tell it to look for a corresponding RAW file. So, provided I first create JPGs of all my X3F files, which I can batch through Iridient (and it takes quite a while), then Mylio will catalog and display the JPG, and will allow me to send it to Iridient - which then opens the RAW. Problem solved.

Mylio 6

Sigma JPG previews cataloged in Mylio

Unfortunately, this particular image has a bad case of Sigma green/magenta cast disease, which in extreme cases Iridient can’t handle.  So I eventually processed in Sigma Photo Pro instead. And Sigma Photo Pro, which is clearly designed by a part-time high school intern with hostility issues, naturally can’t even open a file directly (you have to use it’s browser) never mind do the JPG-X3F association trick.

Of course, trying to handle Sigma RAW files in Mylio makes me something of an edge case on an edge case, but it is nice that a reasonable workaround exists.

I have now loaded all my RAW, scanned and processed images as far back as 2010 into Mylio, for a total of 40,700 files. It’s coping quite well with this load, so far.  In order to ease the process I’ve completely reorganised my file structures, and now have everything under year headings, as opposed to Original/Finished split across different devices as before. Mylio is happier with this, and it also makes it easier to archive. Actually, I think everything except Aperture, which doesn’t care either way, will be happier with this arrangement.

Unfortunately I’ve discovered that Mylio does not support the RAW format for the Olympus E-1 and E-400, which form the bulk go my pre-2010 work.  So I’ve had to impose a cutoff, and use MediaPro to catalog my earlier archives.

All this administrative work has been a complete pain, especially coming after I had already spent quite some time first trying to do the same thing for PhotoSupreme, and then for CaptureOne.  So I hope I haven’t made a strategic error in going with Mylio. Having finally got a coherent structure in place, with intact key wording, and a revised backup strategy up and running, I really hope I can get back to the actual objective here, enjoying photography.

Posted in Product reviews on Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 05:53 PM • PermalinkComments (3)

3 comments

Bernard July 23, 2015 - 10:50
Hello there David,
I am surprised at your decision… I have been trying out Mylo for a few hours, and it seems rather basic, or am I missing something? For instance :
- I could find no way of comparing 2 or more photos (zoomed or not).
- There is this impossibility of sending more than 1 photo at a time to Iridient.
- It does not handle Fuji .raf files (the workaround you used for your Sigma files does work, but doing this for hundreds of photos?).
- The metadata are much less detailed than even in C1.
- The keywords, hum… I could not even find how to display the list you show in your post (well, I could once, but never again). And even if I could, how do you remove what Mylio so cheerfully suggests?
So far I'm not convinced, especially since what is maybe for you the aving grace of the program (the syncing capabilities) is completely useless to me. It does import files quickly, and the interface is nice, but, but…
Show me the light 😊

3 comments

David Mantripp July 23, 2015 - 11:19
I kind of agree with everything you say - and in particular the lack of a compare mode, which I hadn't yet noticed - but for me the saving grace is not so much the syncing, which is nice, albeit not that easy to fully grasp, but rather fact that this is a product which certainly appears to have a forward vision rather than being abandoned in the past. For me C1 fails as frankly the image quality is pretty poor for Olympus files, and I speak as somebody who rarely bothers about pixel level details. Given that, coping with the half-baked version of Media Pro they've bolted on hardly seems worth the effort. However if my main system was Fuji then no, I wouldn't consider Mylio right now.
I am worried that Mylio is going to suffer in the market as being seen as either a rather expensive add-on to Lightroom, or a app for the iMarket. But at the same time, if it does go more "pure DAM", then it might fail to attract enough revenue.
On the metadata front, yes, it's a little primitive at present, but then again it does support full XMP interoperability, so you can always use, say, Adobe Bridge to enter keywords and IPTC fields.

3 comments

Bernard July 23, 2015 - 11:45
Thanks David.
For Fuji files the quality of C1 seems rather good to me, I have not tested it with Olympus files (I have no Olympus camera now, except an OM-4 which C1 seems reluctant to deal with). But, after a quick try of Iridient (which I had not touched in years), I must say it seems better than C1, in the details department at least, and also the color is less "punchy". By comparison, C1 seems to apply some kind of exggerated clarity setting, details in Iridient are finer.
Regarding Mylio, I think I will pass for now, nice as it is. Too many showstoppers, the lack of support for Fuji files being the main one. But it may become interseting in the future… The addition of a versioning system would be nice.
Best,
Bernard

Previous entry: A few further thoughts on Mylio

Next entry: Hotel Mundal